appeaz's four SKUs all carry EU CPNP and FSC coverage. None of them carries a supply price

appeaz's pitch is speed, not ritual: a sun stick, a cooling mist, a leave-on mask and a perfume, each one framed as a "10-second" step rather than a routine you set aside time for. It is aimed at an active, heat-exposed, gender-neutral customer rather than the usual multi-step skincare buyer — and unusually for a four-SKU debut in this catalogue, every one of the four already carries the same pair of certifications. What none of the four carries is a supply price.

The brand

appeaz positions itself for "active 20s tackling daily heat and UV" — recovery products for someone who has just trained, sweated, or spent time outdoors, built to be fast rather than elaborate. The brand's own language leans on a specific clinical claim: a "0.00 irritation index" and "100% hypoallergenic" positioning. That is brand-supplied copy, not a line item in our certification records, so treat it as a claim to verify with the brand's own test report rather than a registration you can cite on your own.

A fully-notified line with no price attached

Every one of appeaz's four SKUs carries the same two certification entries: EU CPNP and FSC Certified. That is a cleaner compliance picture than most brands this size show us — but the two certifications answer different questions, and it is worth keeping them separate. EU CPNP is the actual EU safety notification a cosmetic needs before it can legally reach an EU shelf. FSC Certified is a packaging-material credential — proof the paper or card packaging comes from responsibly managed forestry — and says nothing about the formula itself. A listing that reads "EU CPNP + FSC certified" as one undifferentiated compliance badge is overstating what the second half actually covers.

Set against that, every one of the four SKUs has an empty supply_price field. The short marketing description is filled in for all four; the longer description field is not. For a buyer trying to model landed cost before ordering, that is the gap to chase directly with the brand rather than something you can work around from what is published here.

The four SKUs

Tranexamic Acid Soft Sun Stick SPF 50+ PA++++ pairs a brightening-adjacent active with sun protection in a stick format — a category increasingly asked for by buyers who want SPF that doesn't read as a separate skincare step.

Lacto Shot Jelly Mist is a jelly-textured facial mist built around a lactobacillus ferment, positioned as an instant cooling and hydration shot rather than a toner you'd use as part of a longer routine.

Ectoin Leave-on Bubble Mask replaces the sheet-mask step with a leave-on foam built around ectoin, an osmolyte ingredient this catalogue already carries in a handful of other brands' formulas — see Grincelllabs' ectoin serum for a different brand's take on the same ingredient.

Bergamot Non-Alcohol Perfume is the one SKU outside skincare proper — a body fragrance built to be alcohol-free, which changes its shipping and storage profile relative to a standard alcohol-based perfume. Its ingredient list discloses the EU fragrance allergens by name (limonene, linalool, citral, geranyl acetate among them) rather than hiding them behind a generic "fragrance" entry, which is the more defensible way to label a scented product headed for the EU.

Who this fits

Carry it if your customer base already buys into "recovery" framing — gym retail, wellness concept stores, travel and duty-free assortments — rather than a traditional skincare shelf, and if your target market is the EU or a market with equivalent requirements, where the CPNP notification is directly useful. The allergen-disclosed perfume in particular is easier to list honestly than most fragrance SKUs we carry.

Skip it if you need a landed-cost number before you can quote a customer — that number does not exist yet in our data for any of the four SKUs, and you will need to go directly to the brand for it. Skip it as well if you plan to repeat the brand's "0.00 irritation index" claim in your own marketing without the underlying test report in hand; it is not something we can currently back with a certification record, only with the brand's own copy.